Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emi Fontana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 06:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Emi Fontana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article subject lacks notability. See WP:BIO. The numerous cited sources hugely fail WP:RS being advertising, blogs, affiliated, or self published works. Most mention the subject only in passing or not at all. A Google search failed to yield any significant RS sources. Article is a naked WP:PROMO piece by a WP:SPA. PROD was removed. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:41, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: maybe the subject could have some notability (eg. this article from Il Sole 24 Ore or this one from The Huffington Post) but I agree with the nominator's concerns about WP:PROMO and about the SPA/COI creator, so probably WP:TNT is the best choice here (for now). Cavarrone 21:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep There's a fair amount about her or her work.,  ,  . Agree with Cavarrone content issues can be worked out editing the article. --  Green  C  23:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable enough. Most of the curation was of the works of Mike Kelley (artist), who is certainly notable. But Kelley's most important shows were not curated by Fontana. There might be a case for a sentence or two in Kelley's article though. Johnbod (talk) 13:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - This curator has a lot of mentions on ArtForum and other major art magazines if you check Highbeam. 5deadlydaisies — Preceding undated comment added 22:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC) — 5deadlydaisies (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr  \ talk / 04:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.