Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil Kroner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Emil Kroner

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD contested on grounds of ''1-His officiated 2 international matches were enough for notability as became BIO article such as football player which notable with play at least a international match (even friendly). 2- There are a lot articles in wikipedia as this article (with database sources or without newspaper sources)''

Appears to fail WP:GNG but is name checked in numerous Romanian sources. I cannot find any source that goes into any depth about him, though, and I can't see any potential for this article to be fleshed out at all. In most of the sources, he is very briefly mentioned and, in most cases, it's simply to state that he's one of the few referees to have officiated 4 Romanian Cup finals.


 * - mentioned once
 * - once
 * - once
 * - once
 * - once
 * - once
 * - once
 * - once
 * - once

A referee is not deemed inherently notable simply for having refereed a cup final or an international match. If anyone finds WP:SIGCOV for Kroner, please ping me. Spiderone 11:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  11:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 17:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources fail to establish notability. Australianblackbelt (talk) 01:08, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- The SandDoctor Talk 05:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Devoke water   (talk)  10:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.