Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilia Dalby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 23:56, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Emilia Dalby
Possible conflict of interest, author is Emilia's own father and has only ever edited this article. "Emilia Dalby" gets 114 Google hits. Proposal for deletion was contested, so going to AfD instead. I vote delete. J I P | Talk 04:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails notability per WP:BIO & WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 05:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I have moved relevant comments by the author from the article itself to the article talk page. Richard Pinch (talk) 07:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - is the only notable source I can find and it isn't a particularly good one. Probably delete for now. Brilliantine (talk) 08:58, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  14:12, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Esradekan, and WP:COI. Darrenhusted (talk) 14:29, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Only 25 unique hits on the UK Google, and the only thing that even looks like a reliable source amidst the handful of blogs and Wiki mirrors is that Hello "article;" I qualify it because the article is, in fact, all of four sentences long . She does have a very professionally done personal website, though, although bikini shots of a 13-year-old are in the way of creepy.    RGTraynor  20:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless cite found - Article says that at age 13 she's the youngest classical recording star; provide a reputable third-party cite confirming that and it can stay, otherwise I'm afraid she's just not notable enough yet. Simesa (talk) 23:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - she looks to be an up and coming artist, but there's no coverage right now to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 20:06, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless independant sources can be found. Seems like a nice kid, but not notable. Edward321 (talk) 21:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.