Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emiliano Pagnotta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. T. Canens (talk) 04:03, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Emiliano Pagnotta

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

An assistant professor who appears not to meet our standards for notability of academics. Google Scholar only lists a handful of citations to his work and there is no claim made in the article or in his university bio of passing the guideline on any other count. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:04, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Phil Bridger (talk) 15:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing to really say about this--I haven't found any evidence he meets WP:PROF.Prezbo (talk) 17:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This GScholar search returns only four hits, most of which are working papers.  Only an assistant professor.  Clearly falls short of  RJC ''' TalkContribs 19:06, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not have the citation record to pass WP:PROF #1 and there is no evidence of passing any of the other criteria either. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be a vanity entry and the individual does not meet WP:PROF.--Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 20:15, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:SPA-created and basically WP:PROMOTION, as many early-in-career academic pages are. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 20:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.