Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilie Mover (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) by &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 03:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Emilie Mover
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:MUSIC and although there is a couple of other sources out there, her mention is in passing and certainly not substantial enough to pass GNG. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:14, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator
 * Comment. not meeting wp:musicbio? Sulfurboy, I've actually never seen you make an edit that wasn't on-point before, but on this would one would like to point out the Juno Award (the Canadian equivalent to the Grammys - there is no higher, and is even listed at No. 8 with "Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award."), and sources like these, all of which I would argue add up to non-trivial coverage of her. Exlaim.ca (Exclaim!), ref to Juno Award in National Post,, top 10 album at NOW Toronto, etc. But I'll look about for more, probably after a nap. It's late here. Earflaps (talk) 05:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Winning a Juno is sufficient for inclusion on its own, and there's enough coverage to have a decently-sourced short article. --Michig (talk) 08:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Article definitely needs content and sourcing improvements, but winning a Juno Award is an automatic keep per WP:NMUSIC #8 (it's even named right in #8 as one of the canonical examples of an award that passes #8.) Keep and flag for refimprove. Bearcat (talk) 08:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment This was my mistake. Closing for speedy keep. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.