Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Atack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The consensus is that the subject does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Emily Atack

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This was proposed for deletion on April 2nd with the following reason: "If she is 'best well known' for a bit part, that suggests she is not particularly notable. . .", contested by IP without reason given on the next day. I re-PRODed it by mistake. AfD nomination on the following grounds: No independent reliable sources to show this person passes WP:ENTERTAINER. MLauba (talk) 11:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —MLauba (talk) 11:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  —MLauba (talk) 11:32, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The nom sums it up for WP:ENTERTAINER. No indication that the subject meets WP:GNG either. decltype (talk) 11:38, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The article states that she starred in two somethings that turn out to be disambiguation pages but they were just television episodes according to IMDB for a total of 7 television episodes. I'm sure she's very nice but she just doesn't meet notability requirements at this stage in her career.  Best of luck to her. Drawn Some (talk) 02:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.