Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Bushnell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator after consensus that WP:PROF is met. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 16:14, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Emily Bushnell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

She does not appear to meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG. Chair of department, but not enough to pass notability. Boleyn (talk) 15:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:56, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:56, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:56, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Six of her publications are listed by Google scholar as having over 100 citations each (h-index = 28), a high enough number to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF despite psychology being a high-citation field. The Tufts encomium on her retirement doesn't really count towards notability, but it does give her a more independent and in-depth overview of her career than we often get for academics. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC).
 * Withdraw nomination I'm convinced by the arguments of the editors above. Boleyn (talk) 11:35, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.