Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily C. Heath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 04:28, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Emily C. Heath

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. red dogsix (talk) 23:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Her journalism is not at a level to establish notability, and the nature and structure of the religious group she belongs to are not such that her position is one of notability of an encyclopedic level.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment, have notified women project of this afd. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not at all notable - fails WP:JOURNALIST and WP:GNG. StAnselm (talk) 08:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * At best, dubious -- NN journalism; minister of a church - usually NN; which leaves us with what appears to be a non-academic book, whose notability is at best not established. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:40, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete My searches have failed to establish notability for her or for her book.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:43, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The coverage is severely lacking here. I don't see enough third party sources (the affiliated sources and the blog don't count). Neither would the subject pass any of the other guidelines of an Author or Journalist. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete An internet search for me turns up only non-independent sources and some works the subject wrote. Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. Thegreatgrabber (talk) contribs 02:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.