Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Mae Young


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Emily Mae Young

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article previously WP:PRODed in June 2014 (note that the PROD was endorsed by a second editor, before being WP:DEPRODed later). Not notable former child actress: fails WP:NACTOR (if we're generous Step by Step and Undercover Angel gets her to "two notable roles", but not "multiple notable roles"). Also, clear WP:GNG fail: only single barest possible passing mentions in Variety, LA Times and EW, so no "significant" coverage of her. Bottom line: doesn't meet the notability threshold for a stand-alone bio article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment. She was also noted as the spokeskid for Welch's Grape Juice, and I think she may barely pass WP:NACTOR. But I agree that substantive online content about her is scarce to the point of non-existence. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I agree that the bigger issue here is actually WP:GNG rather than WP:NACTOR. Bottom line: I'd like more eyes on this than during the 2014 PROD, to determine if this one should stay or go... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:51, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I think she's more well known as the spokeskid for Welch's Grape Juice than for Step by Step. Though I was kind of shocked to find several trolling comments on video sharing sites, and even IMDb, suggesting that Emily Mae should have been given to a child molester. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 02:39, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, I think this is why some editors are uncomfortable with the project having articles about child actors unless they are particularly notable. FWIW... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:49, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. I'm very uncomfortable with having articles on child actors that decided to have normal, anonymous, lives as adults. Like Emily Mae... Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 02:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:51, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:51, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as entirely trivial and unconvincing with no genuine claims of substance and significance. SwisterTwister   talk  05:32, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.