Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily McDowell Studio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:40, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Emily McDowell Studio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sources are unreliable and trivial (closest to RS, Bloomberg, is just a press release). Guy (Help!) 14:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  15:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  15:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  15:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional article, does not seem to pass WP:GNG. --MarioGom (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete promotional Smallbones( smalltalk ) 02:40, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This article fails WP:GNG because its sources are WP:ROUTINE coverage and significant reliable sources could not be located when I searched for them. The article has also been heavily promotional in nature from its inception. Newshunter12 (talk) 10:58, 31 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.