Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Ramsey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 09:27, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Emily Ramsey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Never played in a fully professional league and thereby fails WP:NFOOTY; it has not been demonstrated that she passes WP:GNG. Ymblanter (talk) 02:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:25, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Her move to Liverpool cos MUFC had no senior female football team was covered here: 1 2 3 4 5. There is enough to pass WP:GNG. Dougal18 (talk) 07:51, 11 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Coverage above is not significant. It's routine transfer news and related. GiantSnowman 11:31, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. The claims that the transfer meets GNG are incorrect, both as consensus is transfer reporting is inherently routine and even if it was not, it would be a case of WP:BLP1E. Fenix down (talk) 13:44, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I am a little worried about WP:UNDUE here because the user who recently created this Sixtrap, has a number of recent similar contributions, Ebony Salmon, Millie Turner, and Martin Dixon-Green. I think we should be especially careful about WP:BLPRS given that these are young people (tho, Dixon-Martin has no age listed). Fred (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete – Does not pass WP:NFOOTY or in my opinion WP:GNG. Eagleash (talk) 17:16, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTY, can be recreated if and when she meets those requirements. 21.colinthompson (talk) 19:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.