Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Wright


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:31, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Emily Wright

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable recording engineer. Out of the five references listed in the article, only the second one actually mentions her -- and that's only in passing. A Google search came up with the same kind of results. Erpert (let's talk about it) 03:21, 4 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable. without finding other ways to say it... "she is not significant to the industry". She has not produced songs only worked on them as an engineer and a lack of credible sources leads us to one conclusion... what makes her so significant that she deserves an article page when many other engineers (in their hundreds and thousands) don't get one. She has not won awards or anything etc.Lil-unique1 (talk) 03:26, 4 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, not enough references, and out of references given, i only found one that actually mentions her. Overall not notable enough, plain and simple. I have no problem with the article being recreated when/if more work is added along with more references to meet with wiki notability guide. ..:CK:..  ( talk 2 me ) 04:23, 4 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete She exists, and is a recording engineer but no coverage other than trivial mentions. Should be speedy since it meets CSD A7.--Savonneux (talk) 04:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral Can be recreated ONLY when there are enough reliable sources. She is notable for music industry unlike other users said. Tb hotch Ta lk C.  05:21, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:GNG. Anemone  Projectors  13:20, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.