Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eminem is Back (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:12, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Eminem is Back
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Per WP:MUSIC, this is unofficial, non-notable bootleg album that has not had significant coverage. The article has been deleted before. Karppinen (talk) 21:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * G4 and SALT. Been deleted once as non-notable, G4'd in the second afd. Why are we even here, other than to ask for the salt shaker? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I originally speedied it, mistakenly thinking it was AFD'd only once. That's why some admin declined speedy and suggested new AFD. Yes... WP:SALT just might be appropriate for this. Karppinen (talk) 22:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete as "[r]ecreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion". Season to taste as undead zombie that will not stay dead. --RrburkeekrubrR 22:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * G4 and salt. It was a unofficial mixtape the last two times, and it won't change just because someone keeps recreating it.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:28, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy, salt and move on. Still not notable, nothing's changed. Nothing more to see here. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, G4. No idea why the G4 was declined. Hairhorn (talk) 03:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:NALBUMS "Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only, and unreleased albums are in general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources, which seeing there is no references at all, there aren't even close to enough reliable sources, there are none. --Volbeatfan (talk) 04:17, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per notability concerns noted above. This article, such as it is, actually appears to be expanded and improved from the previously deleted version, so G4 does not necessarily apply, but a quick delete per WP:SNOW may be appropriate. Rlendog (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete AbbaIkea2010 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:00, 26 February 2010 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.