Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eminent people of the world


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Eminent people of the world
Content is repetitive with Lists of people, bad content forking. I suggest that the page be deleted and then a redirect be created. Savidan 08:09, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Delete. NatusRoma 08:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, since there's no criteria for "eminent" and for the above reason. Snurks T C 08:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, impossible to populate this properly since we will never all agree on who is eminent.-Mr Adequate 08:57, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above MLA 10:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Totally subjective and given that all biographies on Wikipedia should be of notable people, any of them could belong here (even Brian Peppers). David | Talk 10:40, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, who is eminent is totally POV. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 19:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a WP:NPOV violation; eminent by what definition and in whose eyes?  (aeropagitica)   21:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, completely arbitrary. Punkmorten 21:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No good can come of a list such as this. Haikupoet 02:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete POV per Dustimagic Ruby 02:51, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - total POV.Blnguyen 03:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Dbiv/David.  ikkyu2  ( talk ) 21:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Carlossuarez46 22:39, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Herostratus 01:50, 19 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.