Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eminotebook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:27, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Eminotebook

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Not notable; seems WP:MADEUP. A search for sources finds nothing at all. Contested PROD, and the editor who nominated the article for PROD also tried to find sources without any result. bonadea contributions talk 14:35, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —bonadea contributions talk 19:24, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, invented, non-notable even if genuine. Hairhorn (talk) 01:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete speedily. Fails WP:V and falls well short of indicating why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.