Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emio Tomeoni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 22:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Emio Tomeoni

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not notable - at least not yet. Very few google hits and only the given reference seems to come close to reliable. Young film-maker mostly posting things on youtube. Film production company website is on tripod.com noq (talk) 21:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 03:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy without prejudice toward recreation if/when notability standards can be met. The 3 bits found in a Google News search were neither substantive nor significant about the individual, thus failing WP:GNG. However, his film is just now geting out... per The Californian and Berkeley Daily Planet... so Tomeoni may be back before too long.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:12, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete I can't find any significant coverage. Per MQS, but I don't see the point of userfication here given the state of the article. When/if he becomes notable, recreation is always possible. Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, as a userfication is a delete. I just wanted us to appear a bit more friendly than many newcomers find. Giving it back to him is just a way to say "keep trying".  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.