Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emirates Airline Services


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  merged to Emirates Airline. --Reinoutr (talk) 08:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Emirates Airline Services

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Aside from being advertorial in nature, the subject lacks multiple, non-trivial, independent sources which would afford the subject notability in an encyclopaedic context, thereby it also fails WP:V. Additionally, if one refers to the current version of the article, the first reference doesn't even mention Emirates, and has been lifted from another article for anothr airline. Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 12:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The company is part of the same group as the the well-known airline, Emirates Airline. --Eastmain (talk) 13:33, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment It needs to be noted that Emirates Airlines Services is not a company, but the article is mere advertising for Emirates inflight features. --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 15:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge to Emirates Airline. It is undesirable to spam Wikipedia with article extolling everything about Emirates Airlines with separate articles about their inflight services, their wonderful Emirates Airline Cabins, their Emirates Airlines blankets and pillows, their Emirates Airlines inflight movies , their Emirates Airlines peanuts, etc, etc. Edison2 (talk) 16:08, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as above. --Bduke (talk) 01:37, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge what little is notable and then delete.  AK Radecki Speaketh  18:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as above. Not sufficient notability to justify its own article' Mjroots (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per all above. Stifle (talk) 12:43, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.