Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Jones (journalist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 22:32, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Emma Jones (journalist)

 * - (|View AfD) (View log)

I've marked this for deletion as the entire entry has only one verified source, and the link is broken. Alternatively more resources should be added/updated Saigon2010 (talk) 17:12, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:35, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:57, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment "one source" isn't a valid reason for deletion. C T J F 8 3  chat 19:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The link to the source in this article is dead.-- Piast 93  19:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Searched GNews for "Emma Jones" Sun and found three article about her in national newspapers. However, if this article stays, one fact missing from the article is that she was axed from The Sun when Rebekah Wade took over. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 20:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Chris Neville-Smith, do you mind providing links to those news articles. They'd help me decide whether to keep or delete this article. Thanks in advance!-- Piast 93  15:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Here are the big three..


 * Keep Thanks to the research Chris Neville-Smith did, I believe that this journalist is - in all likelihood - notable enough for inclusion.-- Piast 93  19:28, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep ( - rather reluctantly; I suppose writing for The Sun does count as journalism.) This is provided the above links are added to the article and the BBC connection is revived or replaced. Peridon (talk) 20:07, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.