Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Rayne Lyle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 10:47, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Emma Rayne Lyle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable actress Fails WP:NACTOR + WP:GNG – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:39, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 10 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. There was a brief mention here, another extrabrief mention here in the prestigious EasyReaderNews, a brief blurb here in a local paper, suggesting that the Nlyle in the article's history is Nina Lyle (mother of Emma and possibly a COI issue), her name here, and a mention here but we really need some writeups in something on the caliber of USAToday, Time magazine, Variety, Entertainment Tonight, or maybe even an influential or well-respected blog on the entertainment industry, possibly, although blogs are not the best sources. Not sure how much weight the Young Artists awards carries; again, two nominations, not sure what this award is all about. My sense is ERL is EaRLy here at Wikipedia, but with supporting family members, she will be back in Wikipedia in a few years.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt until she is grown up; unless she plays a child role as in Kramer vs. Kramer in the meantime. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 12:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - we often delete article about barely notable child actors, and with the alleged COI in mind of the stage mother, I am even more inclined to do so. Bearian (talk) 17:40, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.