Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Summerton (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Emma Summerton
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

last AfD is hardly convincing and the article has hardly been improved. 2 of the sources contain short mentions of Emma. a mere 6 gnews hits of small mentions. fails WP:CREATIVE. there is no indepth coverage of her, nor has she won major awards, received significant peer recognition. LibStar (talk) 04:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree that Summerton fails to meet the notability requirements of WP:CREATIVE. She also fails to meet Wikipedia's general notability criteria.  To meet WP:CREATIVE, she must either have done something ground-breaking, be cited by peers or her work must be the subject of multiple independent reviews, etc.  None of these seem to be the case.  She is a professional photographer whose work is printed in magazines, but that is just her job.  Most online sources are either self promotion or photo credits.  The news articles are not at all exclusively about her, but rather just make mention of her in passing.  The references in the article are very weak and it is questionable whether they are independent at all.  They do not mention an author and are not published in a mainstream journal or magazine and the absence of such reliable, secondary source refernces points to a failure to the meet general notability requirements.  She's a good photographer, but not a notable one (by Wikipedia standards in any case).  Wikipeterproject (talk) 19:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 17:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.