Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Vigeland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Emma Vigeland

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

She is not notable enough, as shown by the lack of coverage by reliable sources. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. You can tell a political commentator is not yet notable when 1/3 of the sentences in the article about her discuss what sports teams she is a fan of. No independent reliable sources have been provided. As a second choice, redirect to The Young Turks. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:26, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Young Turks. Capitalistroadster (talk) 05:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable political commentator.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I ran a few likely searches, found no WP:SIGCOV.  probably WP:TOOSOON. I don't even see enough to argue for a redirect.E.M.Gregory (talk) 09:40, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Almost a WP:SPEEDY case here. It is pretty obvious this individual is not notable given the only thing the article says other than her job occupation and college is that she is a fan of sports teams. Wikipedia has developed a WP:WALLEDGARDEN relating to The Young Turks which undermines our credibility as an encyclopedia and must be dealt with. Wikipedia is not a fansite. AusLondonder (talk) 14:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I absolutely agree. I encourage you to request the deletions of the pages of a slew of other blatantly non-notable Young Turks personalities (note that some of them are actually notable, such as Cenk Uygur). I can't do it, due to a ban that admins custom-made for me (I can't do more than two similar actions on Wikipedia, such as requesting the deletion of three TYT personalities for the same reasons). Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I will take a look (I don't personally have the best AfD record, though). I'm glad to see several nominated at the moment. AusLondonder (talk) 15:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.