Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Borowsky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that he fails WP:CREATIVE due to a lack of significant coverage. Fences &amp;  Windows  18:24, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Emmanuel Borowsky

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

fails WP:CREATIVE, not sure about the awards he has won, has had very limited coverage in the press for someone that sounds much greater in his article. gnews. LibStar (talk) 04:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree with nom. Little press coverage, little to substantiate WP:N in the article.  Delete -- Samir 04:45, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 04:51, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep -- substantial coverage in and . Those concerned about forgery of magazine articles :) should note that the scans contain sufficient information to verify the publications in print form; Verifiability does not require that complete verification be possible using only material freely available online. Andrea105 (talk) 02:25, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 2 articles about the Borowsky family rather than Emmanuel specifically do not make for sufficient in depth coverage to satisfy WP:BIO. If this article was about Borowsky family then those sources are ok. Emmanuel is an active musician according to the article then there would be no problems finding coverage in the US press (which publishes most things online). LibStar (talk) 10:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * If we're going to have an article on the Borowsky family, then this article should be merged and redirected there, not deleted. Andrea105 (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * it can be redirected there if it exists. LibStar (talk) 02:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It will exist if the appropriate content from the relevant individual articles is merged. Closure as merge and redirect is not precluded by the present non-existence of the target -- indeed, there's every reason not to merge the content until the AFD discussion is completed. Andrea105 (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, Frances Borowsky, Elizabeth Borowsky, and Cecylia Barczyk seem to present similar issues :) Andrea105 (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I have now nominated Frances Borowsky, Elizabeth Borowsky. Cecylia Barczyk seems marginally notable having actually had an established musical career unlike her children. LibStar (talk) 05:45, 24 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I see no major awards, no major recordings, and no performances with first-rate international orchestras. At least, not yet.   DGG ( talk ) 05:25, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.