Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel John Winner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 08:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Emmanuel John Winner

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

unreferenced, non notable, books are vanity press, music seems to fail WP:MUSIC, most likely vanity, previously deprodded ccwaters (talk) 12:37, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I can't find any info about the publisher of his books, but several have been scanned by Google books and appear to be held in the collections of university libraries.
 * http://www.instantpublisher.com/ ccwaters (talk) 13:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 16:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 16:37, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 03:17, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Author is User:Ejwinner.  Autobiographies are strongly discouraged, and for good reason.  He was pointed to WP:AUTO days ago and chose to ignore the recommendations there, just as he's chosen to ignore numerous other policies in his edits to Rochester, New York.  Powers T 14:10, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, several types of searches on several variants of his name reveal no notability whatsoever. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.