Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Mogaji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 02:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Emmanuel Mogaji

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Professor of Marketing academic does not meet WP:NBIO- lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:17, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:17, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 09:23, 26 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: article is created by an SPA, close connection is observed. This IP address (119.160.96.208) (is it the same editor? Possibly. ) Anyway, this IP address makes the claim the article passes NPROF. (passes WP:NPROF) at AfC. It has WP:PEACOCK in the writing, again suggesting a close connection. Does not meet WP:NBIO --Whiteguru (talk) 09:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — Notability threshold isn’t met as neither GNG nor relevant SNG is met. The tone of the article comes off as an attempt to promote the subject. Celestina007 (talk) 12:30, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete maybe WP:TOOSOON with his academic appoint just starting and he just graduated with a PhD in 2016. His GS profile is still thin and a major impact on the field has not yet been demonstrated. The Literati award is a good sign but its a single paper award and now what NPROF is looking for. --hroest 14:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Until I just fixed it this article contained the lie that the subject is a professor. He is in fact a senior lecturer, which is well below the rank of professor. It is very unlikely that anyone with such a position could pass WP:PROF, but I will not investigate further any article based on such a lie. Why do so many academics feel the need to lie about their positions? Anyone would think that they are above such considerations, and would realise that they will be caught out anyway. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject does not meet NPROF as his listed publications are not highly cited and the listed award does not meet NPROF#2. A before does not bring up sources to meet the GNG either.   Princess of Ara (talk)  12:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.