Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Otteh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Emmanuel Otteh

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Cannot find any significant news coverage on him. Lesliechin1 (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lesliechin1 (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Lesliechin1 (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Lesliechin1 (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Articles about Roman Catholic bishops are notable. Thank You-RFD (talk) 20:27, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The "Roman Catholic bishops are notable because we say so, but we will delete better sourced articles on worldwide leaders in other faiths" position is clearly biased. We have no actually accepted and developed notability criteria for religion, and so we must go with GNG. The sourcing here in no way passes GNG and no one has presented any other sources that so notability, so we should delete. We currently have thousands of articles on bishops sourced only to 1 blog website that essetially has a short timeline summary of their life, but not even signifanct prose covering them. There are clearly notable Roman Catholic bishops, but the notion that everyone who holds the title of bishop in the Roman Catholic Church has received enough coverage to create an article on them is not sustained, and so we need to find coverage of Otteh to justify the article, and it is not in existence.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:25, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, I couldn't find sufficient sources for the article to pass GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 11:09, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Complete absence of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources and therefore fails to meet the GNG. Jack Frost (talk) 13:18, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Sufficient news sources do not exist. Lesliechin1 (talk) 23:56, 5 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.