Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotional Pet Support


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 16:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Emotional Pet Support

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

We already have an article about the subject in general, and this specific website/organization appears to fail the notability criteria at WP:ORG. VQuakr (talk) 01:30, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:45, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete the article and redirect Emotional pet support (lowercase) to Emotional support animal. The article that presently exists is an advertisement for a company that is not notable. - Richard Cavell (talk) 12:12, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  17:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect as per R. Cavell's proposal. All content is either redundant of that in Emotional support animal or constitutes promotion. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  20:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FORK. We usually don't keep two essentially competing articles, when the first one has worked fine. Bearian (talk) 00:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.