Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotional baggage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 14:55, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Emotional baggage

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article essentially is a definition with a few POV-selected examples. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. PROD removed 2 months ago, and the only substantive change was revising the examples. It remains a definition with a few examples. Cresix (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Cresix (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Cresix (talk) 17:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per my reasons for nomination. Cresix (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I don't see any POV issues at a first glance, although it's written like an essay. It's reliably sourced, though. Also, you don't need to !vote on an AFD that already nominated. Electric Catfish 00:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Not just a frivolous every day phrase, it has depth as a psychological concept, the article just needs further development.--Penbat (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:46, 16 September 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.