Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotionally challenged


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete, Enochlau 01:02, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Emotionally challenged
wikipedia is not a jargon file Rast 04:48, 4 December 2005 (UTC) KEEP - its funny
 * weak delete - It is a common expression, however I've heard the term used by people to mean various things, often in an at-most semi-serious context. -Meegs 05:14, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as above; this is jargon, and the article is nothing but ill-informed, unscientific and nonsensical ('inherently bi-polar in their physical representation of their emotions'???) Peeper 12:33, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - reads to me like a dig at fans of emo music. FreplySpang (talk) 16:01, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article needs to be improved, but I think the subject is likely to be useful. Aucaman 02:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Arm 17:07, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * KEEP. It could be improved, but it IS a way of defining 'emo' by normal day standards


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.