Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotronic (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.  Z- man  19:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Emotronic
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is about a term. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and there are no references for notability or verifyability. The article also goes against the manual of style WP:NEO Azazyel (talk) 03:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Emotronic does not exist in any factual context, the term has no cited usages in mainstream media or knowledge. Hypermusic (talk) 23:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Just because a few bands use the term doesn't mean it's a notable genre. Precious Roy (talk) 12:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Although the term does seem to be used somewhat (a google search returns several pages of hits), it is a relatively new term and not widely used in mainstream musical press. Until it is a more widely used and accepted term, deletion is the only option. Nouse4aname (talk) 13:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable and also not varifiable as a music genre or subgenre.13Tawaazun14 (talk) 01:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 15:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Stifle.Divinediscourse (talk) 22:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Delete it, it dosen't have enough backing except for myspace, however if this does gets out and gains popularity I suggest we bring this back, but until then it does not have enough support XXxChriscorexXx (talk) 16:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.