Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emperor Cartagia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Babylon 5 characters. czar 23:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Emperor Cartagia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minor WP:PLOT element that completely fails WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Deproded by User:Andrew Davidson with unhelpful technical summary. Andrew, can you tell us why you think this topic deserves its own article? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - A minor character and an article almost entirely dedicated to in-universe summary; the only reference is to one line in a book which seems to just reproduce TV credits. I wouldn't oppose a redirect to List of Babylon 5 characters. WJ94 (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I would support a selective merge, per Sgeureka. Some of the entries at List of Babylon 5 characters are pretty long and I don't think we need that much detail. WJ94 (talk) 18:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Soft delete with a redirect is always preferred, so I support such an outcome. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:13, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Merge and redirect to List of Babylon 5 characters. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Babylon 5 characters but only because the LoC didn't follow WP:SUMMARY. There is no reason for an individual character article at this point. – sgeureka t•c 08:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.