Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Employabilitree


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per CSD G11. (Deleted by User:Jimfbleak under the rationale, "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: no evidence of notability.") (Non-administrator thread closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 08:56, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Employabilitree

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable neologism and promotion Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 22:23, 3 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - neologism, essay, and possible original  research  based on  one source. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:25, 3 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - This is essentially spam and I think qualifies for a Speedy under that category. Quick look at the only reference shows it. Bagheera (talk) 22:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as WP:SPAM. The article is purely promotional. Qworty (talk) 22:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable neologism. This artile is ludicrous: it's a shme there is no db-too silly for words tag.TheLongTone (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.