Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Employee experience management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 05:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Employee experience management

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Sounds very much like an advert, but am not sure if a speedy deletion is needed. Queenie 14:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Seems to be genuine management/human resources terminology for which there is a lot of material available. Needs a copyedit though, seems to be written by a non-english speaker.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  16:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

This term is in line with 'customer experience management'and it is modern approach toward 'internal marketing' based on the employees experiential needs. It is also agree with fresh movement in marketing (experience economy, experiential marketing, ...), which are emphasized by awesome scholars and practitioners like Berry, Schmitt, Holbrook, Meyer, Schwager, Caru, Cova, Pine, Gilmore and so on. Besides, there is not any adv. or copyright problem. --Kaveh.abhari (talk) 08:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

The concept of experience applies to the both external and internal customers (e.g. O'loughin & Szmigin, 2005; Schmitt, 2003). Therefore, EEM is 'Customer Experience Management' but for 'Internal Customers'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.170.57.243 (talk) 10:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  | Talk 01:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

There is no need for delete since it's logical and reasonable according the many studies by scholars such as Enzminger, 2005; Grace & O’Cass, 2004; Harris, 2007; Lloyd, 2006; Meyer & Schwager, 2007; Millard, 2006; Mosley, 2007; Rahman, 2005; Schmitt, 2003 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.170.57.243 (talk) 07:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.