Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Employee voice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. If an editor wants to work with the content of this article in Draft space, contact me or WP:REFUND Liz Read! Talk! 23:51, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Employee voice

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

an indecipherable mess of prose. blow it up, then blow it up again. ltb d l (talk) 08:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Some sort of an essay, without proper context. Not Essay. Oaktree b (talk) 15:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete with the possibility of re-creation by someone with a better grasp of what Wikipedia is for. This topic seems to have recognition in the literature, but the article is a personal essay. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep 'Employee voice' is a an appropriate topic for an article. It's a widely accepted concept (see e.g. https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/voice-factsheet/ ) and there's a growing body of academic literature on it (see, for example, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369998765_Employee_Voice_A_Systematic_Literature_Review . The current article certainly certainly needs a lot of work to get it into better shape, and I note that the January 2023 version appears to have been deleted and replaced by editors in September 2023 who seem to have been working on this article as part of an assigned project for an educational course. Reverting in full or part to the Jan 2023 version might not be a bad starting point for improving the article. Hmee2 (talk) 15:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * this version? yeah, that's... also not very good.
 * ltb d l (talk) 15:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * ltb d l (talk) 15:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: A complete mess with no salvageable revision to revert back to. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 16:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Move to draft. I think this is a concept with potential, and we definitely cover related topics such as Employee stock ownership and Workplace participation in the United Kingdom. BD2412  T 20:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per above, an unsourced essay with no salvagable content. If there is an article here, the author shouldn't be burdened with this legacy.  // Timothy :: talk  21:58, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.