Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Employment References


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Employment References

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nonencyclopedic article. Wikipedia is not a "how to" guide. Unreferenced, original research. Evb-wiki (talk) 13:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - article is largely a copy of this, but in the edit summary the originator claims that he is the author and it is his website, so copyright issues should be resolvable. However the article is original research, citing no independent sources; and Wikipedia is not a how-to manual or guide. JohnCD (talk) 13:39, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. Nothing encyclopedic here. JJL (talk) 13:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per original research. Pushing an agenda, leaning towards spam, and factually incorrect WRT UK law. --Blowdart | talk 15:01, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Independent Source: http://jobsearch.about.com/od/referencesrecommendations/a/referencetips.htm Dwrjr (talk) 15:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Too much original research, doesn't even seem accurate. --Tefalstar (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NOT.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 18:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.