Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empower Playgrounds (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. If a merge is still desired, start a discussion on the talk page. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 04:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Empower Playgrounds
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources are old; only independent one is 2008 Statesman article, and technology does not seem to have caught on. Nothing found in Google News archive or Google Scholar searches, and only Google Books hit is passing mention in possibly-POD book. If kept, should be merged to Brigham Young University.  Mini  apolis  21:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge - merge to Brigham Young University. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment; I've found a few sources:
 * Daily Fail;
 * USA Today (behind paywall; accessible without Javascript).
 * Le Figaro (en Francais)

Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC).  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge as this is still questionably solidly notable. SwisterTwister   talk  18:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have added a number of reliable sources to the article. Meets GNG. See this page for a starting place. Articles about the company have appeared in USA Today, Grist (just a rehash of the Fast Company article), Fast Company, and many other reliable sources. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.