Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empress of the Seas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was strong consensus Keep for the rewrite, after nomination withdrawn. Xoloz 15:50, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Empress of the Seas
Delete. Text sounds like advertising, suspicion of copyright-violation Peter S. 14:53, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Copyvio. Text taken straight off from the website of Royal Caribbean. Nonetheless, I think cruise ships are inherently notable, so I won't oppose a rewritten version. Sjakkalle (Check!)  15:50, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the rewritten stub. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:09, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep if anyone is motivated to write non-copyvio content, else delete Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 16:27, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep if rewritten to remove copyvio. 23skidoo 16:57, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I wrote it to stub quality on the temp page. Foofy 19:07, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * That's a nice stub. I would support using this stub instead of deleting the article. Peter S. 00:47, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep the rewrite. Carioca 21:07, 9 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.