Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empty cans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:33, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Empty cans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. red dogsix (talk) 15:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paraguay-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. The article as it stands is terrible. But I think this might actually have some coverage, and I'm inclined to be a little permissive to counter systemic bias (to say that our articles on the cinema of Paraguay are incomplete is an understatement). First things first, if this is kept, it should almost certainly be moved to Latas Vacías. As for sourcing, this article from the Paraguayan National Secretariat of Culture discusses the film somewhat (although the awards it won are probably minor in the Wikipedia scale). This article has sort of a minimalist review (citing its popularity but not its quality), and at least according to my terrible Spanish skills, implies it had a domestic release in Paraguay. This one also suggests that a release was at least planned (it's an earlier article, so...) and gives some background on its production that would allow us to cite things like the film's language and budget. I presume there's more in Paraguayan media, most of which is simply not searchable online. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Agree on the name and I've changed the bulk of the article (sans the article name) to reflect on the name it's actually known under. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:47, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Not that I ever supported deletion, but HEY, nice job Tokyogirl79! Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Actual Guaraní language name:
 * Director:
 * Producer:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment: I'm finding quite a bit, but I am running into a little bit of trouble with the exact release date. It looks like an early version of the film was shown in 2013, but that the official release didn't happen until 2014. There is a lot more information at the Spanish language WP, which I'll try to incorporate. So far this is looking like a keep from my end, since there is quite a bit of coverage and there is a review, along with some awards. I'm not sure of all of them, but they look like they could potentially contribute to notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:26, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY: . Cavarrone 10:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep per meeting WP:NF. Notable to Paraguay or in the Guaraní language is perfectly fine with en.Wikipedia, as shown and exemplified by and her due diligence.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 00:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per my comments above. I've also moved this to Latas Vacías since it looks very likely that it'll be kept and this is the most common name that the film is known under, to the point where coverage is almost exclusively under this name. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   15:02, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.