Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emre Gökay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Emre Gökay

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A 17 year old footballer who fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV. I was unable to find any significant coverage during a search and both of the sources in the article are match reports that mention him once. Alvaldi (talk) 20:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Alvaldi (talk) 20:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify promising young player that just made his debut, there's some coverage online but most of it probably to come.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:19, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment my ideal recommendation would a redirect to 2022–23 Sivasspor season, with a draft restored if he is still playing next season. But that may be too complicated.  Draftify may be the more feasible option. Walt Yoder (talk) 22:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Draftify - Upcoming player, however, the article currently fails WP:GNG. ImperialMajority (talk) 14:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗ plicit  03:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: While no editor suggested keeping the article as is, discounting the blocked sockpuppet there does not seem to be any consensus on what to do with the article. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aoidh (talk) 02:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete and not draftify. We need to wait quite some time for him to become notable enough. If it were to be draftified, it would probably get deleted after six months anyways. Aintabli (talk) 03:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Drafitfy - Per Ortizesp. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article comprehensively fails WP:GNG. Jogurney (talk) 16:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: BLP, Fails GNG and BIO. BEFORE showed promos, database records, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Keeps above provide no sources. Oppose Draft, no reason to increase the uproar about Drafts just being a back door to deletion and in any case there is no excuse to keep poorly sourced BLPs. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  07:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.