Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/En passant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Holy Hell. -KAP03 (Talk &#x2022;&#x20;Contributions &#x2022;&#x20;Email) 23:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk &#x2022;&#x20;Contributions &#x2022;&#x20;Email) 23:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

En passant


The concept of a pawn capturing an empty space is an obvious WP:HOAX. Reliable sources confirm that this is just a glitch rather than an intended move: It's very clear that no sources exist to confirm that this is real, even if I haven't googled it to confirm. Deletion should be a forced move in light of this. Randi Moth TalkContribs 17:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * https://lichess.org/blog/XKJWmhAAACUAkPqT/the-pawn-bug-finally-fixed
 * https://support.chess.com/article/4570-illegal-pawn-capture-glitch


 * Move to Software feature – trust me, I worked at Chess & Co. in 1800. lol 1 V N I O  (           s       talk me ) 17:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Ban players who use the move as it is clearly cheating. -KAP03 (Talk &#x2022;&#x20;Contributions &#x2022;&#x20;Email) 19:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect to KaptaşHero (talk) 19:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Use variants that do not allow en passant. En2que (talk) 20:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a hoax per WP:G3. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 21:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Drop a new response &#128156; melecie   talk  - 22:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.