Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/En vänlig grönskas rika dräkt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JohnCD (talk) 18:18, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

En vänlig grönskas rika dräkt

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article provides no additional information past what is presented in Carl David af Wirsén. C(u)w(t)C(c) 03:39, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. A bit iffy (talk) 11:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. A bit iffy (talk) 11:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

*Redirect to Carl David af Wirsén - it's a lovely hymn but without more to say about it, the main article is sufficient. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - I've added 4 sources from Sweden's major newspapers, with a 'Reception' section and an 'In public life'. The hymn is one of Sweden's favourites, oddly enough both to celebrate summer in that wintry land, and for funerals. This should be enough to keep the article; Per Rydén's 700-page book no doubt contains more material for the future. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:32, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep – now a viable, albeit still somewhat stubby, article, supported by independent reliable sources providing nontrivial coverage. --Lambiam 21:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was a bit stubby. Added 5 more sources and written it up a bit better now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:43, 22 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – the article is much better now, and no longer the same text as the article taken to AfD. Good work, Chiswick Chap. /Julle (talk) 15:04, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - improved a lot since nominated. I appreciate the efforts.  →TSU tp* 17:18, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.