Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enaction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was histories merged. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Enaction

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article primarily concerns Enactive interfaces and that content already has been placed on the new page Enactive interfaces. The remainder concerns Enactivism and already has been moved to Enactivism. Consequently there is no further reason for this page. These actions are an outgrowth of an analysis of these articles by MachineElf1735, Bob K31416, Snowded, and Brews_ohare. Brews ohare (talk) 19:34, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * See WP:How to fix cut-and-paste moves or delete Enactive interfaces and do a proper move to "Enactive interface".—Machine Elf 1735  19:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * See also WP:Articles for deletion/Enaction (philosophy).—Machine Elf 1735  20:14, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The approach I have taken will work just fine. If you want to use a different approach and re-do all the work involved in transferring material to two different articles, then you do it. I am not going to try again to implement the plan decided upon. Brews ohare (talk) 21:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 05:03, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete. Reasons provided are clear: the article is redundant having had all its content moved to Enactive interfaces and Enactivism. Brews ohare (talk) 14:42, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * No consensus. We should decide on the talk page how to fix Brews' mess.—Machine Elf 1735   17:36, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 16:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.