Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enamel signs in argentine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:52, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Enamel signs in argentine

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )


 * Delete. Poorly written, poorly referenced, wrong tone for WP, does not fit in with current articles, and may be a copy vio. Ok, all but the latter are not grounds for deletion but collectively it screams "Delete". -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 06:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep/merge Making vague accusations of copyvio is improper. Note that Jimmy Wales is today reported as saying "The internet as a whole must not tolerate censorship in response to mere allegations of copyright infringement."  The general topic of enamel signs is notable as there are multiple books devoted to it.  We ought to start with a high level of coverage and so I have started a stub, enamel sign.  The particular coverage of the matter in Argentina might form a section in that, pending further digging. 13:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * DGG left a note on the talk page about the copy vio. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. Most of it isn't even about enamel signs, but about posters. The little that is is WP:OR and/or unreferenced. Nothing worth merging to Enamel sign. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.