Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enamul Hoque (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Enamul Hoque
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously speedy deleted. Promotional. Doesn't pass GNG. The article presently has 3 sources - BritBangla (2 paragraphs, does not seem this is a RS), a deadlink to Oitij-jo, and an interview given to The British Journal of Photography. In my BEFORE I did find plenty of other people with same name (a NY academic, a witness to a terror attack, a newspaper editor in Pakistan, a former Bangladeshi social welfare minister (who would pas NPOL), and others) - but fairly little in terms of high quality coverage of this individual. Icewhiz (talk) 13:17, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:17, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:17, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:21, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:21, 13 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as proposed. -- Hoary (talk) 02:14, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. I've looked around, and all I can find are personal profiles, interviews, or otherwise non-independent non-RS sources.-- SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 14:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.