Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enchanted 2 (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Enchanted_(film). (non-admin closure)  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 03:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Enchanted 2 (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NFILM, future films are generally not notable without coverage in independent reliable sources indicating the principle photography has begun. Prod removed by anon without explanation. All material present at Enchanted_(film), suggest redirect to same. Sum mer PhD (talk) 02:18, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per guideline. I wanted to say keep on this one because it does seem like the project is going to happen. But this is clearly covered by the guideline Notability_(films). I guess the film industry is very unpredictable. --Gccwang (talk) 23:39, 8 September 2014 (UTC)




 * Redirect this searchable and sourcable topic to Enchanted_(film) just as the nominator concluded in his opening statement. Guideline and policy allow that a sourcable topic may be spoken of somewhere even when not in a separate article. Thus we may send readers to the parent topic.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 10:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:17, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Enchanted (film) - I'm usually lenient on stuff like this but there's no release date nor any info on filming yet, All TOOSOON. Seems better to redirect than delete. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  03:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. It's too soon for an entry, but it'd be reasonable enough for a redirect. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.