Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encompass (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of mergers and acquisitions by Yahoo!. MelanieN (talk) 23:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Encompass (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:DGG with the following rationale "acompany that size is likely to be notable . First check for sources; then, only if not found, nominate for deletion at AfD.". I don't see any sources for stand alone notability; at best this could be merged to List of mergers and acquisitions by Yahoo!. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * How about a mention and redirect to the parent company? I assume that a proper article can be written from secondary sources, if anyone wanted to do so, but there's no sense in keeping a short thing like this around. -- Y not? 17:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I an totally fine with a merge and redirect closure at any point. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect I would be satisfied by that also.  DGG ( talk ) 02:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect as mentioned, clearly not solid as a separate article. SwisterTwister   talk  06:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.