Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encore career


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep. Although probably a neologism, the majority of the respondents here opined that the term has been the subject of significant non-trivial coverage in independent sources, and note that such sources are cited in the article. As well, the content of the article appears to be verifiable in reliable secondary sources.  Jerry  talk ¤ count/logs 00:49, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Encore career

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable neologism. Prod contested by author. -- Finngall  talk  22:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

This is a term that refers to a generational move. I have used citations from various sources, please let me know how i can better improve the article so it will not be deleted. AccountStaff (talk) 22:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 
 * Keep. Article's sources establish that the term and concept are notable. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 02:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I've heard of the term before, but I've also heard the concept called several other things. As of right now, it seems to be a WP:NEO Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 16:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PeterSymonds  (talk)  19:41, 16 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia can have articles about neologisms if there are "reliable sources specifically about the term", and there are at least those: . I think it has widespread use, widespread enough  to warrant an article. I'm more worried that the article is a WP:DICDEF at the moment, but think that it can be expanded to a useful article. Keep. --  Amalthea Talk 19:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.