Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encyclopedia of bread


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Encyclopedia of bread

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails both the SNG for books and the GNG. A non-notable book with no academic review published by a Russian academic in Kemerovo, it has received coverage in the local press, but such articles  are advert-like in content. Article was also created on the Russian wikipedia, but was speedy deleted there. Kges1901 (talk) 09:46, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:33, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:30, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  05:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment: I've left a note at WP:RUSSIA asking if anyone could look for sourcing, as it's most likely only going to be in Russian. I particularly wanted them to look for any academic sourcing, since I don't know if that would be something that would come up in a Google search. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  20:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- as noted by the nominator, deleted from ru.wiki. Seems to be part of a promo campaign, which is rather pointless as all ext links point to a Russian language site, such as this author's page. Delete per WP:PROMO / WP:TNT. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.