Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/End-diastolic dimension


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn; article redirected (Non-admin closure). Intelligent  sium  20:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

End-diastolic dimension

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

As per WP:NOTDICDEF this seems to be just a definition of a medical term, or terms, which says nothing about the subject other than the definition. A Google search doesn't turn up anything to suggest otherwise - various uses but no good references. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 12:31, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * merge to diastole. Polarpanda (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Had almost forgotten about this article. I (original author) have moved this to be a new section of Ventricle (heart) along with redirects. There is also "end-systolic dimension" which could go there as well, but it is not as commonly used. Also added a ref for its definition. Diastole could have a ref to the new location if desired. Facts707 (talk) 07:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Also did "end-systolic dimension" in the same manner. Facts707 (talk) 08:03, 16 January 2010 (UTC)


 * withdraw can someone who knows how to do it close this AfD as it's been dealt with by a merge & redirect which seems the best option, and if any editor has issues with it they can fix it in the articles. -- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 16:37, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.