Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/End of Time (Lacuna Coil song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Dark Adrenaline.  MBisanz  talk 01:59, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

End of Time (Lacuna Coil song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NSONG all criteria MJH (talk) 02:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge to Dark Adrenaline. Probably not enough for a standalone article but would be worth summarising in the album article. --Michig (talk) 08:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep The song has received quite some critical reception an media coverage even before being released. It will gain even more after its release. --Orpheuss (talk) 13:24, 10 dic 2012‎
 * Comment - I read all the citations, and they may support the album having an article. Only one mentions this song outside a listing, and it just says that they are making a video. There does not appear to be a repeated substantial discussion of this song. Looking on google, all I find are lyric sites and content provided by the band, nothing 3rd party. I listened to their live performance in the music store, it is a good song!. ---MJH (talk) 14:35, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nom's analysis is invalid, debunked by the cited references. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  talk to me! 09:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete - WP:NSONG has very direct criteria. 1. ranked on a national or significant music listing. 2. won a significant award or achievement. 3. Been covered by multiple notable musicians. So far the song has achieved none of these three criteria despite some press recognition and ultimately my reasons for a delete argument. Mkdw talk 09:39, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:49, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NSONGS. There are a lot of references there, but when we remove the useless tweets and whatnot, what we have is a case for the notability of the album. I cannot even recommend a redirect, since it's not a plausible search term. People have got to stop assuming that notability is automagically inherited. § FreeRangeFrog croak 03:00, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.