Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/End of ze World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 12:32, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

End of ze World
The page is an obvious vanity article intended to make the insignificant flash-film seem significant. Joffeloff 12:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just, delete. Ben W Bell   talk  12:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, self-promotion. NawlinWiki 12:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No references and does not seem notable. PJM 13:08, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - notability simply not asserted. Colon el Tom 13:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable flashcruft. - Motor (talk) 14:00, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep it's a very popular flash animation, I don't believe the creator of the page is the author of the animation. It gets 50,000+ ghits. As you can see it's hosted on a lot of other sites.-- A n d e h 14:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * AHHHHHHHHHH MOTHERLAND! Wasn't this flash animation done by Gröûp X?  The weird accents are similar.  Whoever did this one also did some Nike commercials a couple years ago.  Not saying that establishes notability, just a comment. &mdash; AKADriver  &#x260E;  16:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it wasn't Group X, but a young guy who runs a web development company. . Doesn't seem notable, so Delete. &mdash; AKADriver  &#x260E;  16:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Fairly popular as far as flash animations go. No actual claim of notability though other than that.  Wickethewok 19:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Per Wickethewok. &mdash; WCityMike (T  &dArr; plz reply HERE  (why?) &dArr;  20:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of notability. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:59, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.